2016-11-29 9 views
2

短時間の間、私はGTK-3.0を学び始めました。私が働くプログラムのGUIを作成し始めました。いくつかのメモリリークを伴うGTKのGUI

プログラムは警告なしでコンパイルされますが、valgrindで実行すると、メモリリークが多く発生し、私が何をやっているのか分かりません。

私は自分のプログラムを最小限のコードに減らしました。問題を簡単に説明できるようにしました。以下のコードに

は細かいが、メモリリークの多くでコンパイル:

#include <gtk/gtk.h> 

int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ 
    gtk_init(&argc, &argv); 
    GtkWidget *window; 
    window = gtk_window_new(GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL); 

    g_signal_connect(window, "delete-event", G_CALLBACK(gtk_main_quit), NULL); 
    gtk_widget_show(window); 
    gtk_main(); 
} 

私はそれをコンパイル:

gcc -Wpedantic -std=c11 -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wconversion -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wfloat-equal -Wwrite-strings -O0 -g main.c -o app `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-3.0 ` `pkg-config --libs gtk+-3.0 ` 

と、私は次のコマンドでvalgrindを実行した後:

valgrind --leak-check=full --track-origins=yes --leak-check=full ./app 

私は以下の出力を得ます:

==14405== Memcheck, a memory error detector 
==14405== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. 
==14405== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info 
==14405== Command: ./app 
==14405== 
==14405== 
==14405== HEAP SUMMARY: 
==14405==  in use at exit: 1,243,902 bytes in 12,774 blocks 
==14405== total heap usage: 80,535 allocs, 67,761 frees, 6,190,649 bytes allocated 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,279 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796522: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A30B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,280 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x4C2FDEF: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E27E7: g_realloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796406: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A30B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,281 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796522: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A371: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,282 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x4C2FDEF: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E27E7: g_realloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796406: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A371: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,283 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796522: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5783B04: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774181: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,284 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x4C2FDEF: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E27E7: g_realloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796406: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5783B04: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774181: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,285 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796522: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577EC1B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774186: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,286 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x4C2FDEF: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E27E7: g_realloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796406: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF90: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577EC1B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774186: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,808 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57993B5: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5798E2C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5788147: g_param_spec_flags (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5191F6F: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x579922C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x4EBFC49: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x7532A1D: atk_add_focus_tracker (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libatk-1.0.so.0.21809.1) 
==14405== by 0x4EC0084: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x5778FA4: g_closure_invoke (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x578AFC0: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== 
==14405== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 2,824 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57993B5: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5798E2C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5788057: g_param_spec_enum (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5FCBAFE: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x579922C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5798E2C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57803A3: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5780520: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5FF16DD: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x5FF3E21: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== 
==14405== 56 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 3,553 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FD5F: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E27E7: g_realloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57959D8: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579B2CC: g_type_register_static (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A53D: g_flags_register_static (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x50A2D0A: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4FB9264: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x579922C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57803A3: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5780520: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x4FBAAB7: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4FBAE82: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== 
==14405== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 4,221 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57993B5: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5798E2C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579C247: g_type_create_instance (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57840D2: g_param_spec_internal (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5788661: g_param_spec_object (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5FD1231: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x579922C: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577FDAC: g_object_newv (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5780533: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5FD1324: gdk_display_manager_get (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== 
==14405== 96 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,132 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795A59: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795B43: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57740AA: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 96 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,133 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795A59: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795B43: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF82: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A30B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 96 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,134 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795A59: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795B43: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF82: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A371: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 96 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,135 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795A59: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795B43: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF82: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5783B04: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774181: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 96 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,136 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795A59: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5795B43: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AF82: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577EC1B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774186: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 132 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,413 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796DFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AFE0: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A30B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 132 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,414 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796DFF: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AFE0: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577A371: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774177: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 148 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,457 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796BD6: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AFE0: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5783B04: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774181: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 148 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,458 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2780: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5796BD6: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579AFE0: g_type_register_fundamental (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577EC1B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5774186: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 176 bytes in 4 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,513 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2728: g_malloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x4FA7173: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4FA7439: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4FA622C: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4F02766: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4F03FE4: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4F0425D: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x577E896: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57801B4: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5780520: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x4F02D27: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== 
==14405== 184 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,528 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FD5F: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E27E7: g_realloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57959D8: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x579B2CC: g_type_register_static (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5785799: g_param_type_register_static (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5787AFB: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x577418B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x40104E9: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:72) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: call_init (dl-init.c:30) 
==14405== by 0x40105FA: _dl_init (dl-init.c:120) 
==14405== by 0x4000CF9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so) 
==14405== 
==14405== 200 bytes in 5 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,549 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x86E2728: g_malloc (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x86FB537: g_memdup (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x4FA7109: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4FA7387: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4FA61EC: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x50EFD11: gtk_style_context_set_state (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4F03EE4: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x4F0425D: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0.1800.9) 
==14405== by 0x577E896: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x57801B4: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x5780520: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== 
==14405== 336 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5,673 of 5,945 
==14405== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) 
==14405== by 0x40136D4: allocate_dtv (dl-tls.c:322) 
==14405== by 0x40136D4: _dl_allocate_tls (dl-tls.c:539) 
==14405== by 0x59C42AE: allocate_stack (allocatestack.c:588) 
==14405== by 0x59C42AE: [email protected]@GLIBC_2.2.5 (pthread_create.c:539) 
==14405== by 0x87218AF: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x8703E9E: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x8703F57: g_thread_new (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x86DE280: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x8392E16: g_task_get_type (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x83F0610: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== by 0x83E4216: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.4800.1) 
==14405== 
==14405== 
==14405== LEAK SUMMARY: 
==14405== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==14405== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==14405==  possibly lost: 3,544 bytes in 35 blocks 
==14405== still reachable: 1,160,006 bytes in 12,091 blocks 
==14405==      of which reachable via heuristic: 
==14405==       length64   : 4,080 bytes in 72 blocks 
==14405==       newarray   : 2,112 bytes in 52 blocks 
==14405==   suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 
==14405== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. 
==14405== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all 
==14405== 
==14405== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v 
==14405== ERROR SUMMARY: 28 errors from 28 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) 

私が本を読んだ後、GTK3 Manualに続いて、どこに漏れがあるのか​​分かります。

私はここでGUIを間違って始めましたか?マニュアルから、私はそれが正しい方法でコード化されていると確信しています。

valgrind出力では、callocreallocがコールされたことがわかります。これは、free()コールが必要であることを意味します。 GTK +でメモリを解放するにはどうしたらいいですか?

答えて

1

これは何度もここで回答されています。これは私が私が適度に使用フォーラムでこれを尋ねた他の誰かへの答えとして与えたものである:それはアプリケーションの人生の時間のために必要な内部バッファを割り当て、割り当て解除に来るとき

GTK +はかなり怠惰です。例えば、アプリケーションの寿命のために必要とされる、初期化中にルックアップテーブルのためのメモリ領域を割り当てることができる。 GTK +はこれを決して割り当て解除しません。 Valgrindの場合、これはメモリリークのように見えますが(技術的にはそうですが)、最適化としてGTK +はアプリケーションの終了時に割り当てが解除されるため、エラーではなく、割り当てを解除しません。 Valgrindがこれらを無視できるように抑制ファイルが必要なのはこのためです。問題は、ほとんどのGTK +バージョンの変更でこれらを変更する必要があることです。

あなたが見ているのは誤認です。 valgrindがこれらを無視できるように、抑制ファイルを使用することができます。自分で作成したり、すでに完了しているものを検索することができます。

+0

私はここでもインターネット上にあると言っていますが、例はありません。あなたの答えに例を挙げてください。私が作成しようとしているプログラムは、すべてがうまくいくなら、少なくとも45日間走ります。だから私はこれを修正する必要があります。 – Michi

関連する問題